. . . and how's that working
out for you?
The United States, along
with many other industrialized nations, is currently engaged in a large-scale
experiment that is in some ways the realization of the fondest dreams of a
small but influential segment of the population. For some time now, many investors, as well as
leaders of the dominant high-tech companies—Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix,
Google, etc.—have strived to move us toward an ideal future in which all human
interaction and economic activity would take place by means of digital
platforms—owned and operated by them, of course. This ideal world would consist of two
classes: the small symbolic-manipulator
elites of owners, designers, and engineers who create and operate these
platforms and profit mightily therefrom; and the masses of consumers whose only
useful function is to use what the platforms provide.
Well, the shelter-in-place
orders that affect about half the U. S. population and have shuttered all
non-essential businesses have violently catapulted us into this ideal future in
a matter of a couple of weeks. And so
far, the results are not good.
Yes, a few lines of business
have benefited: food-delivery services,
the online videoconferencing system Zoom, and those who provide binge-watched
TV series. But we have also seen the largest
number of applications for unemployment benefits in history (over 3 million last
week), a stock market slide resembling an avalanche, and a level of economic
uncertainty that has no parallel in living memory.
I have the privilege of
knowing one of the few people in the U. S. whose weekly routine has been almost
completely untouched by these events. He
is not a resident of a desert island, nor a fantastically wealthy hermit living
in an isolated compound with years worth of supplies. It's just that for years now, he has been
following the shelter-in-place rules by choice.
This relative of mine acquired enough funds to retire about twenty years
ago, and chooses to live by himself and spend most of his waking hours online in
chatrooms, watching YouTube programs, and viewing the occasional sports show on
TV. He ventures outside once a week or
so for grocery shopping, but other than the occasional medical problem, he has
no other human contact, and likes it that way.
The only inconvenience he has experienced so far from the coronavirus
restrictions is that he had to go to four grocery stores last week to find
bread—the first three were sold out. But
other than that, his lifestyle is largely undisturbed.
A nation can afford only so
many people like my relative. It's a
free country, so far, and so if a person chooses to cut himself off from
society like that, he is allowed to do so.
But we are currently experiencing what happens when he is joined by
dozens of millions more forced to live that way. Yes, we're glad there are such things as
Zoom, Netflix, YouTube, and for that matter, cellphones, electric utilities,
and water supplies. But we are also
finding out by direct experience that a vast part of our economy consists of embodied
people going places and being together to do useful and entertaining
things. And when you cut that part out,
everybody suffers in one way or another—the subsistence-wage person who loses
the low-wage service job at a restaurant or movie theater, to the wealthiest
investor who has seen his net worth decline by a third recently.
Underlying the prejudice in
favor of digital everything, and the corresponding disdain for people and
industries that make things rather than bitstreams, is a kind of Gnostic
dualism. The Gnostics were sects popular
in the early years of the Christian era.
One prominent branch of Gnosticism believed that the universe was
divided into a good spiritual part and a bad material part. Because the physical human body was material,
they disdained it and believed that the real person was a good spirit who just
happened to be imprisoned in a decaying material body. The goal of life was to free yourself from
the body and all its trappings, and rejoin the other good spirits after
death. Or something like that.
Well, we are finding out what
happens when we all become temporary Gnostics, and eschew as much human contact
with each other and with our physical workplaces as we can. The distant goal of having everybody exist
mainly online as an anticipation of the day hoped for by transhumanists (a
popular movement in Silicon Valley) when we can all free ourselves from our mortal
biological "meat cages" and live forever as software, has just jumped
into our laps without being invited.
The fact is that human
beings are creatures that don't just inhabit bodies: we are bodies, but we are also more
than our bodies. We are also immaterial
minds, but a mind without a body is incomplete, as is a body without a mind. Any rational political economy will
acknowledge this fact, and will plan for a future that includes bodies as well
as minds—full human beings interacting in accordance with human nature, which—despite
the last few hundred years of innovations in philosophy, science, and culture—has
not changed.
We as a nation will get
through the coronavirus pandemic somehow, though not without serious losses
that could have been mitigated with more foresight. But the experiment we are now undergoing of
trying to live all-digital lives holds lessons for us that we can all profit
from, and I don't mean just dollars and cents.
Here's an idea: if your life has been disrupted by the
pandemic, start writing a list of things you miss from back before the pandemic
began. Ask yourself why these things were
important. And when things get back to whatever
the new normal will be, don't lose the list.
Ask yourself, and ask your leaders, what things we have chased after too
hard, and what things we have neglected.
And then let's try to apply the lessons that this experiment is teaching
us, before we forget about the whole thing and go back to the mistakes we were
making before.
Sources: The 3 million
unemployment compensation applications recorded for the week of Mar. 22-28,
2020 were reported in numerous sources such as The Guardian at https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/mar/26/us-unemployment-rate-coronavirus-business. I also referred to the Wikipedia article on
Gnosticism.
No comments:
Post a Comment