Each January brings with it a slew of laws scheduled to take
effect on the first of the year, and 2013 is no exception. As of Jan. 1, for example, it is now
illegal to make or sell new 100-watt and 75-watt light bulbs that do not meet
the efficiency standards of the federal Energy Independence and Security Act
(nicknamed ERISA). The plain old
tungsten-filament argon-filled bulbs that Edison would have recognized don’t
make the cut, so if you like them you’d better scout around and scarf up any
old ones in stock, because when they’re gone, you won’t be able to find any
more—except maybe in Texas.
Why Texas?
Because a year ago, in defiance of the federal ERISA law, the Texas
Legislature passed a kind of anti-ERISA bill that specifically allows Texans to
make and sell the old-fashioned inefficient kind of bulbs. According to one of the bill’s
sponsors, however, so far no one has rushed to Texas to set up a light bulb
factory—possibly because the only U. S. market would be Texas, avoiding the
interstate commerce that would be illegal under ERISA. Of course, if somebody does eventually
start making them here, we might find bordering states setting up checkpoints
at El Paso and Texarkana, where tough-looking customs inspectors tell you to
roll down your window and ask, “Excuse me, ma’am, but did you buy any live
animals, plants, or 100- or 75-watt light bulbs not meeting the ERISA standards
while you were in Texas?”
The ERISA standard for light bulbs is an example of how legislating
technology can be a hazardous occupation.
The law’s name implies that one of its goals was to lower U. S. energy
usage. There are many ways to do
this, but it’s harder to think of a more visible one than to banish a device
known to every consumer who has ever changed a light bulb. Law is fundamentally about justice, and
laws should be passed to remedy an existing injustice. Using slightly more electricity for
lighting by using an established technology strikes me as one of the more
remote kinds of injustice, so I personally regard this part of ERISA as
misbegotten and counterproductive.
The public antagonism and loss of respect for legislative wisdom it has
aroused have been a price that seems awfully high compared to the benefits in
energy savings it may achieve.
On the other hand, the Texas anti-ERISA law is more along
the lines of entertainment, which is something you can count on with the Texas
legislature. We have a very
part-time legislative body here in Texas, one that meets only once every two
years for a few months. But what
it lacks in duration it makes up for in spectacle. The late long-time observer of Texas politics, Molly Ivins,
liked to recall the 63rd legislative session back in 1973, which started out to
reform some campaign laws and other things that genuinely needed
reforming. She reports that the
effort petered out about halfway through the session, on Apache Belles
Day.
The Apache Belles are the cheerleading team from Tyler
Junior College, and Ivins gives this idea of what the show was like: “The Belles, all encased in tight gold
lamé pants with matching vests and wearing white cowboy boots and hats,
strutted up the center aisle of the House with their tails twitching in close-order
drill . . . .” Then the emcee
instructed the august assembly of legislators (back then virtually all male) to
“look up at the House gallery, where, sure enough, six extra Belles were
standing. At a signal. . . the six
turned and pertly perched their gold-laméed derrieres over the brass rail of
the gallery. Upon each posterior
was a letter, and they spelled out R*E*F*O*R*M.” I don’t know if the Lege still has an Apache Belles day, but
if they don’t, I’m sure they replaced it with something just as interesting.
The irony of the federal ERISA law is that since its
passage, private invention and development has done something that stands a
much greater chance of bringing energy independence to the U. S. than throwing
away slightly less efficient light bulbs, and without any new meddling whatsoever
by the federal government.
Hydraulic “fracking” and horizontal drilling have led to a gas and oil
boom in this country which some observers believe will allow the U. S. to
produce more oil than Saudi Arabia in a few years, and possibly achieve true energy
independence in a few more years after that. Of course, oil producers get various tax breaks that have
been in place for decades, and in that regard they indirectly benefit from
federal largesse, but it didn’t take a new federal law to get the inventors
drilling. New governmental
restrictions on drilling could slow down or stop fracking, though.
The point is that there is probably an appropriate pace and
type of legislation pertaining to technical fields such as energy production
and consumption, but figuring out what is appropriate in a rapidly changing
field is hard for legislatures to do—even mature, responsible ones, which seem
lately to be in short supply. By
far the most influential force in the energy field is economics: the price of various energy commodities
and technologies. Short of
draconian things like rationing, the most that regulators can do is to hobble
or accelerate certain industries or technologies with the hope that the desired
result is not overwhelmed by unanticipated effects that can make the situation
a net loss.
ERISA has another shoe in its hand that will drop next
year: 40- and 60-watt bulbs will
fall under the regulations, so even the dim little bulb in your old refrigerator
will become contraband.
Fortunately, the prices of compact fluorescent lamps and even all-LED
bulbs is dropping, and so switching to the new kinds may not be as much of a
jolt as you might think. But if
anybody has a bunch of old light-bulb-making machinery in their garage that
you’d love to find a use for, come on down to Texas. I’ll introduce you to a state legislator, and there’s no
telling what will happen after that.
Is it okay that someone copied and pasted this article (with attribution in a backlink) at http://www.ecnmag.com/blogs/2013/01/texas%E2%80%99-light-bulb-law-not-brightest-bulb-tree
ReplyDelete(Also, I hate serif fonts like Times and Georgia for on-screen reading. I much prefer sanserif.)