Pornography is a big
business, something that millions of people around the world indulge in, and
while viewing it can get you into trouble if you hold a prominent corporate or
political office or if you get involved in the child variety, it’s a private
affair and not a big deal most of the time.
Pornography is exploitation
that twists and defaces a type of relationship that is the earthly model of how
Christ relates to his Church, and it can spiritually damage and enslave anyone
who gets involved in it, crippling one's ability to relate to the opposite sex
in the way God intended.
Which view do you agree
with? Probably most readers will
incline toward the first view, which says that in most cases, viewing porn is a
private decision that should be left up to the individual, and the legal system
should get involved only in situations for which there is near-universal
agreement that innocents are being harmed, such as the production or viewing of
child pornography. But the second
view (which happens to be mine, more or less) is rooted in a Christian model of
humanity which sees human sexuality as a gift from God, which men and women
have a responsibility to use according to divine instructions. In the second view, pornography
exploits those who are involved in producing it as well as those consuming it, and
debauches (a nice old-fashioned word) the users, accustoming their sexual
responses to images which cannot be approached by the reality of any actual
woman. As such,
pornography—especially the online variety, which is by far the most common
nowadays—is worth opposing, restricting, and fighting with the legal system,
even at the cost of one’s own well-being.
Over the past year or two,
my views on the relationship between God’s law and human laws have
changed. When religious
conservatives who are in the numerical minority in a democratic country manage
to gain access to levers of power, they sometimes indulge a fantasy which goes
something like this: “Pass a law against a popular but immoral thing, and
people will quit doing it.” This
happened in 1919 when the amendment to the U. S. Constitution prohibiting the
manufacture or sale of alcoholic beverages, which came to be known as
Prohibition, was ratified by enough states to become law. Prohibition was a long-term goal of the
Anti-Saloon League, an organization supported by many Protestant churches but
with its power base mainly in rural areas. What did not happen was that alcohol abuse vanished
overnight. Instead, the consumption
of alcohol went underground, leading to smuggling, bootlegger gang warfare, and
a lowering of the respect for law, all of which finally led to the repeal of
Prohibition in 1933. The bottom
line of this lesson is that law works better as a mirror of a society’s mores
than it does as a bridle that tries to jerk the society in a direction it
generally does not wish to go.
That is, laws against a so-called “private” sin such as pornography
should be enacted only when a substantial number of citizens in a country think
it should be illegal. So, while I
am personally unhappy that online pornography is as popular and successful as
it is, my view is that passing lots of laws against it, at least in the U. S.,
would probably be a waste of time.
But not in South Korea.
According to a recent
Associated Press article, a good many South Koreans not only dislike online
pornography, they are trying to do something about it. Making anything illegal on the Internet
is a challenge because of the intrinsically global nature of the medium. But that hasn’t stopped South Korean
law enforcement officials from arresting about 6400 people in only six months
for producing, selling, or posting pornography online.
Almost a third of South
Koreans are Christians (counting both Protestants and Catholics), which makes
it the most Christian nation in East Asia by far. And Christianity in South Korea tends to be taken seriously
by its adherents, who now send more missionaries overseas than many Western
countries do, including those which evangelized their nation in the first place. Many of these Christians make up a
cadre of about 800 volunteer Internet “Nuri Cops” who regularly spend time
patrolling the Internet for South Korean porn, turning in the results of their searches
to police for further investigation and prosecution.
About now, you may be
wondering what kind of person would devote their spare time to viewing
pornography with the sole purpose of wiping it out. To some, it may sound suspiciously like a member of the
Anti-Saloon League who insists on tasting all the wine and beer before pouring
the rest into the gutter. I would
imagine it takes a particular type of person to do this work without being
harmed by it, and perhaps no one is totally immune. But you could compare this type of work to the religious
orders during the Black Plague of the 14th century in Europe who devoted
themselves to the care of the ill, although many of their number ending up
catching the disease and dying of it themselves.
For some readers, this
comparison will seem completely wacky.
What possible parallel can there be between caring for the innocent
victims of a physical disease like the bubonic plague, and snooping around on
the Internet for websites that seem to provide harmless (or at least, not very
harmful) entertainment for people in the privacy of their homes?
It boils down to whether
one believes in the soul as well as the body. If there is the death of the body, there can also be such a
thing as the death of the soul. Enslavement
to sin—any sort of sin—is a road that leads the soul to death, and one way to
help souls escape death is to make it harder to find opportunities to sin. That is just what the Nuri Cops are trying
to do.
While I would like to see
something like that take place in the U. S., we would first have to have a
cultural shift of seismic proportions:
one that would involve a resurgence of authentic belief in Christianity
at the highest as well as the lowest levels of society, in the cities,
editorial offices, studios, and corporate headquarters as well as the farms and
private homes of America. In the
meantime, all I can do is congratulate the South Koreans for acting on their
beliefs, and hope that maybe they will return the favor that Western
missionaries did for them by evangelizing us some day.
Sources: The Austin American-Statesman carried
the article “South Korea’s cyberporn vigilantes” on pp. F3 and F5 of its print
edition of Dec. 16, 2012. I
referred to the Wikipedia articles on “Religion in South Korea” and “Prohibition.”
Great post, I like the reasoning on moral majorities and the futility of prohibition against the will of the governed, not sure about equating the plague but appreciate your argument. Would you consider religion as one of many possible sparks for the conversation that cause this societal shift rather than the only possible source?
ReplyDeleteCertainly there are other sources of societal shifts, but religion seems to be one of the few that would move U. S. society more in the direction I am hoping for.
Delete