One of the recurring themes in
engineering ethics is that power and privilege entail responsibility. Those in positions of influence over
millions of users of a technology should recognize the responsibilities that go
along with such influence. This is
especially true of individuals and organizations that control mass media such
as newspapers, radio, TV, cable systems, and entities such as Google and
Facebook.
In this connection, I would like
to bring to your attention a principle of human nature that I have observed in
action on many occasions over the years.
To my (admittedly limited) knowledge, no one has taken the trouble to
state this principle succinctly, so I'm going to favor you with such a
statement. And because every good
principle needs a name, I will modestly term it Stephan's Law. It is this:
"Every mass medium
eventually advertises its controlling organization."
I will now describe the latest
instance in which I observed this principle in action.
At the end of every fall
semester, I attend the winter graduation ceremonies of Texas State University
for the School of Engineering graduates.
This takes place in a nice indoor coliseum where the basketball games
are played, in which a few years ago they installed one of those giant LED TV
screens colloquially called Jumbotrons.
This one is mounted on a large blank wall behind the stage, and in past
years has been used to show closeups of the speakers and graduates as they
cross the stage to receive their diplomas. In the last couple of years, the video has also been
live-streamed to the Internet. So
it's fair to say that when you have a crowd attending graduation, and they
watch the Jumbotron, it's a mass medium, because everybody in the coliseum sees
more or less the same thing, as well as the Internet viewers. So far so good.
Up to the graduation I attended
last Friday, you saw nothing on the Jumbotron that you couldn't have seen
elsewhere in the coliseum: the
band playing, the president speaking, graduates graduating. But yesterday, something new was
added. Just after the provost
introduced himself and the platform guests, he asked us all to give our
attention to what followed.
All of a sudden I flashed back
on a Lone Ranger video we watched the other night that was made in 1949—the
very early days of U. S. television.
The way that program segued to an ad was to switch from the Lone Ranger
shooting at some bad guy, to a peaceful scene of a field of wheat while the
narrator intoned a phrase that went something like "And now we ask for
your interest and attention."
Why a wheat field? Turns
out that the sponsor of the Lone Ranger program was General Mills. Wheat—Wheaties—General Mills—get
it? Anyway, you can tell that the
producers weren't quite sure how people would take television ads, so they
soft-pedaled them and gave the viewers some time to readjust their psychologies
away from the Old West before hitting them with the sales pitch.
Sure enough, as I watched the
Jumbotron, the provost disappeared and we all watched a three-minute ad for
Texas State University. It was
nicely done—a female chorus sang a bouncy holiday tune in the background, we
saw familiar landmarks on campus, both still and live action, and it wound up
innocuously with best holiday wishes for all. But here was a new mass medium, and although it had taken a few
years, it eventually complied with Stephan's Law—it ended up advertising its
controlling organization.
The first time I noticed an
example of this law was when the old National Educational Television (NET)
transformed into the Public Broadcasting System (PBS) in the late 1960s. Back then, there was a sort of
unwritten rule observed by educators that the classroom was no place for overt
advertising. So for the first few
years of its existence, NET carried no ads of any kind, even for itself, at
least none that I recall. But once
educational TV stations realized that they could take some of that valuable air
time and run pledge drives for themselves, well, the horse was out of the barn,
and now self-promotion is a routine part of the business of PBS.
Note that Stephan's Law makes no
moral judgment. As far as that
goes, I do it myself—after all, now and then I have links to my own blogs. Morality comes into play only when you
take other considerations into account.
For example, does the medium present itself as strictly neutral and
unbiased? It's hard to be that way
when you're telling people about how great you are. So in that case, there's the danger of hypocrisy. And while the amount of time that an
external advertising sponsor can buy in a given medium is limited by the
sponsor's resources, the organization that operates the medium has no natural
limit to its own self-advertisement efforts. Something close to that limit is approached by a particular
cable news channel we watch, Time Warner Cable News. Although the channel carries ads from external sponsors as
well, I think about half of the non-content time on it is devoted to
self-promotion. Of course, I don't
have to watch that channel if I don't want to. But if I choose to, I'm going to see a whole lot of ads for
Time Warner Cable in its various guises.
If I knew more of the writings
of a communication studies guru like Marshall McLuhan, I would probably find that
Stephan's Law was discovered centuries ago after Gutenberg put an ad in his
Bible for upcoming new editions, or something along those lines. (Note to incunabula specialists: I have no idea whether Gutenberg
self-advertised or not, but it wouldn't surprise me.) But in my state of happy ignorance, I present this principle
to you free of charge, and challenge you to watch for the next example of it
that comes to your attention. The
more media there are, the more chances there are for Stephan's Law to be
verified, and in this media-saturated culture, it's hard to go for very long
without seeing an example of it in action.
Sources: I looked for an example on YouTube of the Lone
Ranger-General Mills segue, but for reasons that may have to do with copyright,
it doesn't show up there. However,
some DVD collections of old Lone Ranger TV episodes have it, which is where I
saw it. The word "Jumbotron" is actually a registered trademark of
Sony Corporation, according to Wikipedia, but since Sony quit making those
devices in 2003 the word has passed into the language to mean any large
electronic display board.
No comments:
Post a Comment